Consumers are spending more and more on buying and renting movies online. But the sector is dominated by hardware companies prepared to sell content at a loss to add value to and promote their core businesses, making it all but impossible for standalone movie stores to survive, explains MARIJA JAROSLAVSKAJA, research analyst at Screen Digest.
Online movies are on the rise – in the US, transactional online movie consumption (digital rental and digital retail) grew by over 115% in the last year and will more than quadruple between 2008 and 2012.
The market is less developed in Europe, but growth rates will be even more dramatic. Consumers in Western Europe spent just over €38m on online digital movies in 2008 and will spend ten times more - €381m in 2013.
Despite this growth, digital delivery will still contribute less than 5% of total movie spending at home (physical, digital and pay TV) by 2012. The €194m North American and Western European consumers spent on buying and renting movies digitally in 2008 may be small change in entertainment industry terms, but it is increasing rapidly and the question remains: who in the value chain is taking home the money?
The transactional online movie market is dominated by two key players: Apple iTunes and Microsoft's Xbox Live Marketplace. In the US, these two services currently account for over 85% of all digital transactions.
In Western Europe they account for 16% of paid movie downloads, which is disproportionately high in light of their limited service rollout: iTunes only started offering movies in the UK in the first half of 2008 while Xbox rolled out movies in late 2007 in UK, France, and Germany, joined by Italy and Spain in November 2008. Major hardware-backed stores give an instant boost to local online movie markets. For example, the Spanish market grew by 431 % in 2008 on account of the launch of the Xbox service.
And as iTunes and Xbox services expand across Europe in 2009, they will kick-start new markets and in the process capture over 65% of Western European paid digital movie downloads by 2010.
Hardware software link
Their popularity is a result of a mutually reinforcing dynamic between hardware and content: consumers tend to buy content for a device they already own, while a device becomes more attractive when there is a wide selection of affordable content available for it.
This is how the Apple iPod/iTunes ecosystem came to dominate the global portable media player and online music markets. The high installed base of Apple devices subsequently encouraged the take-up of the iTunes video service as well. For the Xbox, take-up of the service is largely attributable to the 'Trojan Horse' effect: device first entered consumer households as a games console.
For the same reason Screen Digest expects the movie download service linked to Sony' s PlayStation games consoles to carve out a substantial share of the market when it launches in the next few years.
Apple and Micrososoft effectively subsidise their movie services to promote their core products. Apple aims to encourage hardware sales, its true money-spinner, while Microsoft seeks to promote the Xbox platform (in this case hardware is also a loss-leading proposition, with revenues generated by licensing and the sale of third-party software).
This 'value-add' subsidisation model is not new – this is a similar strategy to that which supermarkets use to attract consumers into stores with cheap DVDs and then upsell them to higher-margin products. And to maximise the attractiveness of their platforms, device manufacturers are prepared to pay more to acquire premium new release content from the studios than they generate by selling it.
Apple economics
Screen Digest estimates that in the UK, where Apple iTunes accounts for over 65% of online movie transactions, the store made a loss of around £0.5m selling new release movies in 2008.
Digging further into the Apple iTunes economics presents an interesting picture. While consumers spent over £2m on buying new release movies on iTunes, almost all of this went to the Studios who command up to 110% of the trade price.
The next beneficiaries in line were the Luxembourg tax office (Apple iTunes Europe is based in Luxembourg and under EU rules is taxed based on the citizenship of the company rather than the consumer) with £0.32m, and credit card companies (£0.06m).
The economics play out better in the case of catalogue titles where studios take a 70% cut of the retail price – and digital rental – where their share is 60%, helping Apple to minimize the overall loss on its digital movie business.
However, library titles and digital rental, while more profitable for Apple, have traditionally never been at the forefront of Studio priorities when compared to the sales and profitability of new releases.
With these dominant services – which set the de facto market prices – trying to at best break even, small standalone services are hit by a double whammy of low margin retail prices, which they are unable to influence, and low take-up due to the lack of a device ecosystem.
Moreover, small services are in danger of falling short of the minimum guarantees stipulated by studio licences, which further inflates their unit costs. Across Western Europe, service providers made a gross loss of €0.9m from digital retail movies in 2008.
Digital rental is doing slightly better, resulting in gross revenues of €4.7m. Across the transactional movies sector, service providers made a gross profit of €3.8m from consumer spending of €38.2m. Nevertheless, over 15 online movie services in Western Europe and the US announced their closure in 2008 alone.
Standalone unsustainable
As the standalone digital movie business model becomes increasingly unsustainable, the online video services of Apple, Microsoft and Sony backed by high hardware installed bases and 'value-add” economics will continue to dominate the market.
The only viable competition will come from other companies whose core business lies elsewhere and who are prepared to accept losses on online video delivery to drive consumers towards some other core profit centre.
Video services run by supermarket chains like Carrefour or Tesco might successfully mirror their physical movie lossleading strategy, but this is only likely to happen through careful management and execution of a digital media strategy that takes in the retailer's entire consumer experience – adding value to the existing retail business, not taking a new direction altogether.
In the UK, for example, Tesco has already begun to link its digital music retail operation with the core supermarket business: shoppers receive special codes on supermarket till receipts that offer discounts at Tesco Digital music store. Developing a similar strategy for movies seems like a logical next step.
MARIJA JAROSLAVSKAJA is a research analyst in the broadband media team of Screen Digest specialising in music, connected devices, and free online video consumption.
Contact: Marija.Jaroslavskaja@screendigest.com...
Predicting the future, let alone the future of packaged media, is a perilous exercise, and possibly counter-productive, as the exercise closes doors rather than keep them open, argues JEAN-LUC RENAUD, DVD Intelligence publisher. Consider that: Apple was left nearly for dead 15 years ago. Today, it became the world's most valuable technology company, topping Microsoft.
Le cinéma est une invention sans avenir (the cinema is an invention without any future) famously claimed the Lumière Brothers some 120 years ago. Well. The cinématographe grew into a big business, even bigger in times of economic crisis when people have little money to spend on any other business.
The advent of radio, then television, was to kill the cinema. With a plethora of digital TV channels, a huge DVD market, a wealth of online delivery options, a massive counterfeit underworld and illegal downloading on a large scale, cinema box office last year broke records!
The telephone was said to have no future when it came about. Today, 5 billion handsets are in use worldwide. People prioritize mobile phones over drinking water in many Third World countries.
No-one predicted the arrival of the iPod only one year before it broke loose in an unsuspecting market. Even fewer predicted it was going to revolutionise the economics of music distribution. Likewise, no-one saw the iPhone coming and even fewer forecast the birth of the developers' industry it ignited. And it changed the concept of mobile phone.
Make no mistake, the iPad will have a profound impact on the publishing world. It will bring new players, and smaller, perhaps more creative content creators.
And who predicted the revival of vinyl?
(click to continue)... Read More...